Happy Thursday, Creative Community!

This one comes up in the Lounges constantly, and I've answered it in more comment threads than I can count. Usually in a few paragraphs, usually while a conversation is already halfway to an argument, and never with the space it actually needs. It's time we really dig into it.

A member posts about a project they worked on. Or they post about a professional they've met and are excited to be working with. Someone else in the thread points out that the project they're known for isn't on that person's IMDb page. Then a third person arrives and states, with total confidence, that if it isn't on IMDb it didn't happen and the whole thing is a lie.

The thread gets tense, sometimes accusatory. And often, the person being questioned is telling the truth.

Every situation is different, and nothing here is the absolute rule for every project, company, or country. Credit practices vary by guild, by budget, by territory, and by who negotiated what. That's exactly the point. There is no single rule, which is why stating one with certainty is where these conversations go wrong.

What I can tell you is what recurs, over and over, in the way this industry actually operates. A great many people who do real, substantial work on films and television shows do not receive public credit for it. That isn't a scandal. It isn't a sign of fraud. It's how this business has functioned for decades, and understanding that will make you both a better judge of who you're talking to and a great deal fairer to the people around you.

Three Assumptions Worth Retiring

"If it's not on IMDb, it didn't happen."

IMDb is a useful tool. It is not a perfect record of who worked on a project.

It tracks on-screen credits, primarily. That means if a role doesn't appear in the titles, it generally doesn't appear on IMDb either. Enormous amounts of essential work fall outside that boundary.

It's also editable. Anyone with an account can submit changes, and while there's a review process, inaccuracies get through regularly and legitimate credits get missed. Names are misspelled. Roles are misattributed. Entire people are absent from projects they spent two years of their life on.

If your entire method of verifying someone is checking whether their name appears in a database that only captures a fraction of the people who make a film, you are going to be wrong a lot. In both directions.

"Everyone who works on a project gets credited, and paid."

They don't. Not on independent films, and not on studio productions either.

Credit is negotiated. Sometimes it's guild-governed, sometimes it's contractual, sometimes it's whatever the producer decided. There are people who worked for eighteen months or more on a project who appear nowhere in it, and people with a credit who barely touched it. That's not a conspiracy, it's the accumulated result of thousands of individual negotiations, budget decisions, and title conventions.

"Development professionals must be credited somewhere."

Largely, no.

I wrote about this in more depth in a piece on how the development process actually works, but the short version is that development is one of the least visible and most consequential parts of this industry. The person who found your script, championed it internally, gave you eleven rounds of notes, helped pitch and sell it, and fought for it in endless staffing meetings will almost never get credit on the final project.

That's a whole professional discipline, largely invisible in the public record.

The Invisible Roles

This is the part I most want people to sit with.

Production-side PAs and assistants often do get on-screen credit, and that's genuinely good. But there is an enormous population of professionals in this business who contribute weeks, months, and years of genuine work to projects and receive no public acknowledgement for it.

Assistants. Coordinators. Office PAs. Interns. Readers. Development executives at every level. The people at an agent's desk, a production company desk, a management office.

And it extends well past development. Marketing professionals who built the entire campaign that made a film findable. Trailer editors who cut the two minutes that convinced an audience to show up, often working through dozens of versions for a piece of work that carries no name on it. Pitch deck designers and pitch consultants who shaped how a project was presented in the room where it got bought. Researchers, translators, festival strategists, publicists, the people who prepared the materials that opened every door the project walked through.

Some of these people have been doing this longer than the producers whose names go on the poster. I know assistants who have been in the industry fifteen years, who know every project in their company down to the smallest detail, who read every draft and every revision, who take notes in every call and every meeting, who write the coverage that determines whether something moves forward, who track the whole slate in their head.

It's often described as paying your dues, and there's something to that. But I think it's more honest to say that assistants, coordinators, and the professionals working alongside them are the actual backbone of this industry, and the credit structure was never built to reflect that. Anyone who has been an assistant in any field will tell you the same thing: you do the work, someone else's name is on it, and that's the job.

There's an assumption around here that only senior professionals are worth approaching for feedback. That a note is only valuable if it comes from someone with a title you recognize. But think about what that arrangement actually means. If the President of a studio relies on their assistant's coverage to decide what they read, if a manager trusts their coordinator's notes enough to send a script out on them, then those notes are already shaping what gets made. The industry has been trusting that judgment for years. The only thing missing is a name on a poster.

Some of the sharpest feedback you will ever get on your work will come from someone whose title sounds junior and whose reading hours vastly exceed anyone's you've heard of.

And Then There's the Work Nobody Is Allowed to Talk About

Everything above is about how credit gets assigned. There are two other reasons a professional can't show you their work, and honestly they may be the more common ones.

The first is that they legally cannot tell you.

NDAs are standard in this business. Development executives sign them. Assistants sign them. Anyone who reads material, sits in on meetings, or works on something before it's announced is very likely bound by one.

That means a professional may be actively working on a project right now, doing substantial work on it, and be legally prohibited from telling you the title, the company, the talent attached, or in some cases that it exists at all. Not reluctant to tell you. Not being cagey. Contractually unable.

If a project hasn't been publicly announced, there is often nothing that person can say about it without breaching an agreement or their employer's trust. And announcements can be years behind the work. Someone might spend more than two years on something that the trades won't report until it's greenlit, if it ever is.

So when you ask someone what they're working on and get a vague answer, that vagueness may be the most professional thing about them.

The second is that the project died.

Most projects do not get made. That is not pessimism; it's arithmetic. Companies develop far more than they produce, and the overwhelming majority of what gets bought, optioned, and worked on never reaches a screen.

Someone can spend every day for years on a project. Sell it, sometimes more than once. Fight for it. Help attach a director or talent. Watch it get to the edge of a greenlight. And then it dies. The company changes leadership, the market shifts, the star drops out, the financing falls apart.

There is no record of that anywhere. Not on IMDb, because there's no film. Not in the trades, because it was never announced or the announcement quietly stopped mattering. That doesn't make the work or the experience meaningless. You wouldn't tell a scientist who spent years on cancer research that none of it counted because they never cured anything.

That happens to nearly everyone in development at some stage in their career, and to a great many producers and writers too. If you're evaluating someone by what you can see, understand that a substantial portion of any creative professional's career is made of projects that left no trace, but made them better creatives in the long run.

They're Already Here, and You're Likely Missing the Signs

You wouldn't believe the caliber of experience contributing to Stage 32 Lounge conversations every single day. Many of you talk to these people regularly without realizing who they are, because they aren't here to sell themselves to you or prove anything. They're here to be part of the community. To offer insight where they can, geek out about the things they care about, support people, and keep learning and growing just like everyone else.

You won't spot them by their credits. You'll spot them by how they talk about the work.

They won't rush you toward something you're not ready for. They won't ask for a sample of your writing before genuinely getting to know you. They won't try to move the conversation to a generic email address or off the platform where nobody can hold them accountable.

A real professional will often take their time before opening up to you, and there are reasons for that.

1) They are available for consultations through Stage 32’s proper channels and will direct you to properly book with them here or reach out to the Success Team (Success@Stage32.com) so you know it’s reputable.

2) They are used to being pitched to by more strangers than friends.

I spent years telling Uber drivers I was an accountant. Because the moment I said I worked in development, I'd be pitched to or handed a business card while trapped in a stranger's car.

A member told me recently that after about two years here, building connections the right way with patience and consistency and genuine interest in other people, she's been astonished by how many major professionals have reached out to her privately in the last few months. Not because she pitched them. Because she never did. They appreciated that she took the time to know them, never came at them with an unsolicited ask, and they liked the way she showed up in other conversations.

That's the whole thing. I say it constantly around here, but the members who succeed on this platform succeed because they built real relationships. It may not move things forward as quickly or easily as you'd like, but it makes a stronger and more successful impact when it does, and that matters more.

So How Do These People Prove Anything?

They have private resumes and bios.

For decades, professionals in this business have maintained detailed resumes and bios that exist only for direct, private use. Sent to a hiring executive. Handed over in a meeting. Shared with a potential employer or collaborator. They include the projects they actually worked on, in the roles they actually held, whether or not any of it appears publicly elsewhere.

Those documents are not usually on LinkedIn. They're not on a personal website. For a great many professionals in roles that don't require public promotion, there has never been any reason to publish them, and some professionals would consider it unnecessary and an invitation for nothing but unsolicited outreach.

I want to be clear that I'm not asking you to believe everyone. I'm asking you to stop treating a Google search as definitive proof.

Then How Do I Protect Myself?

A system where credits aren't publicly verifiable is a system people can exploit. That's true. It happens. And you should be careful with your work, your time, and your money.

Here's how I'd approach it:

Ask to meet face to face. Zoom or in person. Not a phone call, not a long email thread. A working professional with good intentions will take a general meeting. If someone is strange or evasive about something that simple, that tells you what you need to know.

Ask to speak with people they've worked with. Also face to face where possible. Ask about the process, the experience, what it was actually like. A legitimate professional will be glad to connect you with someone who had a good experience.

Take your time. Do not rush into sending your script to a stranger. Do not pay someone for a service through a freelance marketplace or over email without knowing who they are. Do not sign anything because someone created urgency around it. Getting to know a person takes weeks or longer, not one enthusiastic exchange.

Have a lawyer look at any agreement. Stage 32 is not a legal service and we cannot give legal advice, but we do have education taught by legal professionals, and our Education Team can point you toward it. Send them an email at Edu@Stage32.com and ask which courses would be most beneficial for what you need to know. Whatever you do, do not sign a document you don't fully understand because you're afraid of losing the opportunity.

And trust your gut. If it seems too good to be true, it very likely is. Ask hard questions. A real professional will respect you more for asking them.

Stephanie Moore, a Stage 32 member and line producer, wrote an excellent piece on transparency and ethics between artists and development professionals that's worth reading alongside this.

Most Importantly, Ask Us

Stage 32 works with over 3,000 vetted industry executives. Those are the professionals taking your pitches, teaching our education, judging our contests, appearing in Writers' Room webcasts, and doing consultations and career development calls. We know exactly who they are. We have verified their credits, their companies, and their standing. We require them to make their bios and credits publicly visible on this platform, which is a transparency standard most of the industry does not hold itself to.

If you book a session with someone through Stage 32, that vetting has already happened. And if you have a poor experience, you can bring it to us. We'll investigate and address it with that professional directly. We hold them to a high standard, the same way we expect professionalism and respect from our members. Just email our Success Team at Success@Stage32.com.

Someone who sends you a network request or a direct message is a different situation entirely. They may be a working professional with decades of experience. They may be a fellow member three months into their journey. They may be someone with no connection to this industry at all.

That openness is a feature, not a flaw. It's what makes this place work. Whether you've been in the industry for forty years or you started today, Stage 32 can be a home and a resource, and anyone can come here to network, learn, and find opportunities that wouldn't otherwise be available to them. But the same openness that lets a first-time writer meet a producer also means people with bad intentions can turn up, just like they do on any public platform.

If someone approaches you privately and you're unsure, email me at Community@Stage32.com and I'll look into it. You're also free to cut ties with the member by removing them from your network. Once no longer in your network, they can no longer privately message you.

And report anything that feels wrong to either me or our Support Team at Support@Stage32.com. If someone is misrepresenting themselves in this community, we want to know so we can remove them. When you speak up, you're standing up for yourself and countless others who may not question it the way you did.

Two Things Can Be True At Once

You should protect yourself. And you should stop assuming that an absence of public credits automatically means someone is lying.

Some of the most experienced, capable, generous people in this industry have almost no public footprint. They've spent their careers making other people's projects better from a desk nobody photographs, and they've never once needed a website or press announcement to do it with pride.

I'd like to hear from you on this, and I'd especially like to hear from the people this piece is about.

If you've worked in an invisible role, an assistant, a coordinator, a reader, a development executive, an intern who stayed late for two years with little or no pay, tell us about a project you gave real work to that your name isn't on. You don't have to name the company or project specifically. Just tell us what you did so we can celebrate you.

And if you've been on the other side of this, unsure whether someone was who they claimed to be, what did you do about it? What worked?

This is the kind of thing we should be talking about openly, because the confusion around it hurts honest people on both sides.

Let's hear your thoughts in the comments below!

Got an idea for a post? Or have you collaborated with Stage 32 members to create a project? We'd love to hear about it. Email Ashley at blog@stage32.com and let's get your post published!

Please help support your fellow Stage 32ers by sharing this on social. Check out the social media buttons at the top to share on Instagram @stage32 , Twitter @stage32 , Facebook @stage32 , and LinkedIn @stage-32 .