Hi guys, I need to pick your minds. I've just finished a script that started out as a modern day interpretation of a classic. All the character traits, places, situations, names, locations etc are different, but the basics of the plot remain. How do I refer to it? Is it a re-imagining? Inspired by? What should I call it? Or does it need to be referred to at all?
1 person likes this
How about "based on"?
1 person likes this
My initial thought was to only use the comparison in a pitching situation such as Jaws in space (Alien) or, Hamlet but with lions (The Lion King).... maybe your story can be pitched in a similar fashion?
3 people like this
I’d go with “inspired by” not “reimagining.” Or refer to nothing extra on the title page. Maybe that “inspired by” aspect is best given in a pitch or in a one-pager, or in other supporting materials, etc. By industry terms and labeling, a “reimagining” is a type of remake with a fancy new hat—something’s been added, like new animation technology or live action. Disney is doing a lot of remakes as “reimaginings” of their classic properties. That’s not what you are doing with a spec script. Just make sure whatever it is you are writing has its own unique take. ;)
It was written over a hundred years ago.
2 people like this
Classics generally are ok to use. Titanic is basically Romeo and Juliet re-imagined. I wouldn't worry about it. If your asked to pitch you can use a comparison and I personally like the term re-imaged. Until then it's not really important.
2 people like this
You’re probably fine, then. But should double check. Make sure it is in the public domain. It could be owned by an estate, family perhaps? ;) Good luck and best to you!
2 people like this
Beth, is right There's also two different things you have to look at. One is of course copyright but there's something else and I just can't recall what it is. I was looking at it the other day but It just escapes me at the moment. Free use or something.
1 person likes this
Ah no sorry I am thinking about photos not books, I think!
1 person likes this
Thanks, Karen Stark . It is in the public domain, so hopefully it is just something I can use in a pitch.
1 person likes this
Now I just have to think up a title.
4 people like this
If it is in the public domain, then, yes, it is free to use. However, let’s say some other version is out there, then just make sure you are using the original source material, what’s in the public domain. Not some element from someone else’s interpretation or adaptation, nor use any of their additions that are unique to their project. That specific version would be under its own copyright protections, even if it too is based off of the same work from the public domain.
1 person likes this
Can you use the original title or were you thinking of some more modern version?
Beth Fox Heisinger I read the book to start with. Same one I studied at school! Much easier reading than I remember.
1 person likes this
Bill Albert It is an old book with an old title, so I was trying to think of something more fitting.
4 people like this
The Lion King is Hamlet
You’re fine. Let it stand on its own two feet.
1 person likes this
I agree with Craig. Every story has connections to predecessors. Just let your tale be itself.
Thanks guys.
Nick Assunto - Stage32 Script Services Good point.