There has been a lot of talk about a screenplay being a blueprint. Firstly no two words in english mean the same thing, so two different words mean they are not the same, but I digress.
Is a novel a piece of art?
If yes. Why does adding visuals and putting it into a different form removal the artistic value?
A screenplay is a final form. It tells a complete story using the elements of the chosen form. It is still art.
Why is that important?
Because artists are held in much higher regard in society. Since they have that elevated state, they start from that position. Non-artistic professions are not given that respect.
Think of the technical people in our industry that demand to be considered artists. Directors
are a good example. They didn’t create the story, their DP compose and control the shot, the editors compose the movie, etc. Yes a director can be involved in those, but not always. Yet, they demand and receive to be considered artists. Their output is art.
We produce a finished and finalised product. That can be used to make a film. This is not necessary for it to be considered art. It is not oats that need moisture to become porridge. A screenplay can be consumed as it is.
A blue print has no value until it is a building. A screenplay is still a story that has future value as well.
Devaluing our art to a blueprint, means we are not artists and can be treated accordingly. We are brainwashed into begging and scrapping. We ask “why can professionals do that?”. Because they refuse to be treated as anything less than an artist, and their work is given the weigh it deserves.
All respect, starts with self respect.
3 people like this
Love to hear this! Bravo & congrats Tom + Claire!
3 people like this
Very cool! Congratulations!
3 people like this
Congrats to Tom and Clare!
2 people like this
Totally Awesome Tom and Clare! Congratulations!
1 person likes this
Clare and Tom, great job! Congratulations on earning those meeting requests...and here's hoping they turn out great!