What Is Cinematic?

What Is Cinematic?

This was the first and last question I was asked as a student in film school. Is it something that we see on a big screen? That can’t possibly be the answer, you can see just about anything on a “big screen” these days and most cinematic experiences now happen in your home. I remember playing Metal Gear Solid on my Play Station and remarking that it was quite a “cinematic experience.” Yet, when I watch the news, I don’t feel like it’s a cinematic experience.

So, in this, I can understand the difference between recorded information and that elusive cinematic exposure. Most wedding photographers are required to cut together a cinematic trailer of the wedding event. This concept is what we can start to define as cinematic. It is a controlled situation, the planned-out execution of what you do to make something feel more grand. When it comes to Cinematography, there are specific ways that the camera can play its part in the construction of a grand ole Cinematic time.

What Is Cinematic

There are a lot of decisions that have to be made at the start of a filmmaking process that is going to have lasting ramifications on everything else. The most important to the camera is the decision of aspect ratios. A lot of the younger members of our community and audiences aren’t going to understand this, but there was a time when we were purchasing at-home movies that were adjusted cuts for our standard 4:3 televisions or the Widescreen, or letterboxed, version that would put black bars at the top and bottom of the film to give us the viewing of 16:9, the standard movie theater aspect ratio.

Many people don’t realize that there are other aspect ratios as well. My personal favorite is 2.4:1, though I’ve been told that is a “cheating aspect ratio” because it’s really easy to get dynamic framing with that wide of a picture. Additionally, the classic 4:3 ratio still has its place in modern content, just look at Zack Snyder’s Justice League cut.

What Is Cinematic

Ultimately, it’s your script that should dictate what aspect ratio you choose. Probably the most famous example is the Jurassic Park franchise. You might want to shoot in 2.4:1 because it’s the most visually stunning frame size, but if you make that decision you’re going to struggle to show small humans and big dinosaurs in the same frame together.

The decision on ratio dictates the entire decision process of the rest of the movie. How things are choreographed, how two people who are kissing are arranged, and how close the camera can get to the two characters’ hands being held. This is an important decision and not one to be taken lightly. It’s truly the first step in establishing a cinematic experience.

What Is Cinematic

Meanwhile, there are a lot of other decisions people are going to make at this stage in the game which will have major cinematic impacts on the film being produced, but as the Cinematographer, you have to make the decision as to what lens(es) you’re going to use. Are you going to use a set of vintage prime Cookes? That will change the stylized look of your film. A Variable Zoom Lens? If you plan on having a Zolly Shot in your film you’ll need that.

On a side note, I really think that shot should be called a Doom Shot because, since its inception in Vertigo, it’s only been used to increase heightened senses of doom. Sorry, I digressed.

Getting back on track, one of the things that make a film cinematic is the control over the image itself. Being able to open your lens to a 1.4 /f and throw a .9ND filter in the matte box and go to the lowest possible ISO setting is an incredible advantage to being stuck at an f/16 because you weren’t prepared.

What Is Cinematic

The next decision you have to make is a production decision that’s ultimately going to be decided by the Director and maybe you are wearing both hats. Are you shooting a Kevin Smith movie or a Michael Bay movie? Those are going to be two very different experiences in terms of your camera movement. If you’re working on Clerks 4 with Kevin Smith your camera movement is probably going to be very tame. Smith doesn’t enjoy moving the camera. In stark contrast, Michael Bay doesn’t seem to stop.

A dolly is different than a truck. When you Dolly you go back and forth, when you truck you go side-to-side. Similarly, a pan is different than a tilt. Left-to-right versus up-and-down. Decisions…decisions. Just imagine a shot where you’re arching around an actor from left-to-right and booming up with a right-to-left pan. That’s a fun shot, just for the record.

You may have noticed that there is a choice I have purposefully left out of the decision process. That choice is what camera you use. While I will say you should try to avoid shooting on a cellphone, even that’s not out of the question. The reality is that the differences in every camera on the market are so technically specific that they all do what is necessary to capture a professional image. Your lens choice is much more important!

What Is Cinematic

So, let’s try again to answer the question we started with. What is Cinematic? Well friends, at the end of my education I was able to settle on an answer. “Cinematic is a combination of sight and sound elements generated for the purpose of telling a story, in a highly controlled environment, with the specific intent to create an emotional response in the viewers who witness it.” I got an A on that answer, but it’s important to note that the answer can be different for everyone.

Personally, I think I really pinned the tail on the donkey with that one. Does anyone play that game anymore? Blindfold a kid, spin them around and around until they’re dizzy, put a sharp needle in their hand, and send them stumbling into a wall…How would you shoot that? More importantly, how would you make it cinematic?

Let's hear your thoughts in the comments below!

Got an idea for a post? Or have you collaborated with Stage 32 members to create a project? We'd love to hear about it. Email Emily at blog@stage32.com and let's get your post published!

Please help support your fellow Stage 32ers by sharing this on social. Check out the social media buttons at the top to share on Instagram @stage32 , Twitter @stage32 , Facebook @stage32 , and LinkedIn @stage-32 .

Get engaged
15

About the Author

Nathan Woodward

Nathan Woodward

Cinematographer, Director, Screenwriter

My unwavering desire to explore new experience after new experience throughout the course of my life has led me on a journey to a destination where being a storyteller is the most natural outcome. I have done everything from working at a gas station to owning a hotel and in those times learned about...

Want to share your Story on the Stage 32 Blog?
Get in touch

15 Comments on Nathan's Article

Hey, I have a DVD of Tomorrow Never Dies where the menu has the option of selecting either the standard or the letterbox version! So there's at least one person on here who remembers that!
2 years ago
Maurice Vaughan
Screenwriter
I remember that, Dennis. I used to watch movies in one ratio, but one day I changed it to test out the other ratio. I had to change back to the first ratio. Guess because I was so used to watching it.
2 years ago
Leonardo Ramirez
Screenwriter, Author, Voice Actor
Great post Nathan! It's funny how we've gotten used to changing ratios through the years. This was highlighted as I watched the aforementioned "Zack Snyder's Justice League" whose ratio I had to get reacquainted with in familiarity. I love anything he does but that took some adjustment. I think it added to its grandiosity. Very informative. Thank you!
2 years ago
Nathan Woodward
Cinematographer, Director, Screenwriter
You are more than welcome Leonardo :-)
2 years ago
Joanna Karselis
Music Composer, Musician
Really interesting Nathan. Your answer to "what is cinematic?" is fantastic, very comprehensive response there!
2 years ago
Nathan Woodward
Cinematographer, Director, Screenwriter
Thank you for the kind words :-)
2 years ago
Slim Web
Line Producer
Amazing
2 years ago
Roshdi Alkadri
Director, Editor, Camera Operator
Thanks for the article. When I started in production long ago at film school we were taught that cinematic means creating a film for audiences at the cinema. I think it means many things to different people, especially these days. Online, cinematic is used as clickbait to anything that can include stylistic color grading, simply placing a letterbox on video or creative sound design. For me cinematic means creating an experience in a feature film for the audience where they're enveloped in the story, or taking a journey where they see a new perspective on life.
2 years ago
Nathan Woodward
Cinematographer, Director, Screenwriter
I like that definition very much. :-)
2 years ago
Marcel Nault Jr.
Host/Presenter, Screenwriter, Author, Agency Assistant
Insightful article, Nathan. Cinematic is an adjective (or concept) that can be applied to photography and music when you think about it.
2 years ago
Nathan Woodward
Cinematographer, Director, Screenwriter
I loved Vampire the Masquerade! You just brought back a billion memories lol.
2 years ago
Marcel Nault Jr.
Host/Presenter, Screenwriter, Author, Agency Assistant
Not to mention roleplaying games like Dungeons & Dragons and Vampire: The Masquerade. The pinnacle of storytelling in the fantasy universe.
2 years ago
Ashley Smith 23
Creative Executive, Script Consultant, Producer
Great article, Nathan! I love your insight on how movement can change the cinematic experience, especially with your examples of Kevin Smith's style vs. Michael Bay's. Thank you for sharing these thoughts with the community!
2 years ago
Ashley Smith 23
Creative Executive, Script Consultant, Producer
I'm also a Kevin Smith super-fan. I adore him and the fact that he always encourages people to just create and forget perfection.
2 years ago
Nathan Woodward
Cinematographer, Director, Screenwriter
Two of my favorite Directors actually. I remember talking with Kevin one time and I mentioned how I want to be a filmmaker but I'm not very good. He said, "Don't worry, neither am I." It was a reference to his complete lack of camera understanding lol. I'm glad that you enjoyed the article.
2 years ago
Bob Harper
Screenwriter, Director, Producer, Animator
Great post! I like your definition of cinematic. Some of the thought processes you mentioned play into what many of us animation directors think of - although the tools and execution are a bit different.
2 years ago
Nathan Woodward
Cinematographer, Director, Screenwriter
Hi there Bob. They are very much the same. All just still images causing an illusion. In a 2 hour movie, shot on 35mm, there are 10 minutes of total darkness the audience never perceives. That's my definition of movie magic :-)
2 years ago
Maurice Vaughan
Screenwriter
Extremely helpful.
2 years ago
Nathan Woodward
Cinematographer, Director, Screenwriter
I'm glad that it helped you Maurice :-)
2 years ago
Daniel Stuelpnagel
Screenwriter, Author, Producer
Nice one, this is a helpful post, gives me some fresh perspective, also confirms some pending choices and food for thought on a few others, I like the explanation of clarity on aspect ratio as a unified element specific to the story, content and characters, thanks for a great summary of these cinematic components!
2 years ago
Nathan Woodward
Cinematographer, Director, Screenwriter
Your welcome Daniel. I'm really glad that you enjoyed reading it :-)
2 years ago
Maria Soriano
Playwright, Screenwriter
Thank you, Nathan
2 years ago
Nathan Woodward
Cinematographer, Director, Screenwriter
You're welcome.
2 years ago
Maria Soriano
Playwright, Screenwriter
Nathan: I really enjoyed reading your blog. When I'm writing, a visualize the scene and try to convey with words how I see it, without calling the shots. Thank you. Very inspirational.
2 years ago
Nathan Woodward
Cinematographer, Director, Screenwriter
My screenwriting professor at school was a genius. He quoted someone saying that you have to write a screenplay that's so good, after the producer, director and actors mess it up, it's still good. Considering how valuable of real estate a single page of screenplay is actually worth, all of it needs to be dedicated to revealing the story. If you write it well enough, the only way to shoot it will be the way you imagined it :-)
2 years ago
Emily Jermusyk
Screenwriter
Fantastic piece, Nathan, and a really great conversation that creatives should explore themselves!
2 years ago
Nathan Woodward
Cinematographer, Director, Screenwriter
I'm glad you enjoyed it Emily. Thanks for the kind words.
2 years ago
Haley Mary
Actor, Songwriter, Comedian
Great article and very informative!
2 years ago
Nathan Woodward
Cinematographer, Director, Screenwriter
I am glad that you enjoyed it Haley. I have a pretty deep passion for Cinematography.
2 years ago
Thanks for sharing your insight into the various aspects of creating a cinematic experience. A truly enlightening and well-articulated post.
2 years ago
Nathan Woodward
Cinematographer, Director, Screenwriter
Thank you Jamie. I am very glad that you enjoyed it.
2 years ago
Geoff Hall
Screenwriter, Director, Producer
Thanks for writing this, Nathan. In terms of choice of camera, we were told that the `Black Magic’ camera was the best for low light conditions. What are you thoughts about that? In terms of aspect ratio, do you have any examples of the difference between 16:9 and 2:4:1, please. What pumps up the cinematic experience of the 2:4:1 lens?
2 years ago
Nathan Woodward
Cinematographer, Director, Screenwriter
Hi there Geoff! Thanks for the comment. In terms of low light capabilities I own two Black Magic cameras: The original 4K Ursa (Monster) and the second generation 4.6k Ursa Mini. I would honestly say that there are better cameras out there for low light production. They do have 14 stops of range for you to play around with and inside Davincci resolve you have powerful tools to reduce noise that you will have if you lighten the image up. That being said, I do believe that BM is a very good camera worth every penny. In terms of the aspect ratio question, what is a ratio? It's division. So a 16:9 figures out to a viewing area of 1.77. A 2.4:1 is a viewing area of 2.4. It's almost double that of 16:9. Dunkirk would be the last movie I'm aware of to use such a large format 65mm. (See, there's all sorts of conversions you can do here.) 2.4:1 is an anamorphic lens. Things like lens flare can be caught naturally and not added in post. I also wouldn't say it pumps up the cinematic experience. I would say that you should choose it based on what you are filming. Action scenes do wonders because all the things that can be going on in the frame. The Zolly Effect made famous by Vertigo is just that much more pronounced. But, American Beauty, was every bit as dynamic even though it was shot in a smaller aspect ratio.
2 years ago
15