The reason I wanted to get some input on my feature film in development is because it is very unique and has a niche market. So, I am trying to figure out the right approach to getting it funded. A brief description first. The plot is about a journalist who makes a trip to india to write about each of the previous Dalai Lamas (the present is 14th) including how they were found as the reincarnation of the previous one. The journalist meets a mysterious woman on the plane and his search for her leads us through the spiritual journey. It also shows us contemporary life of tibetans in india who still practice the ancient traditions. So, in a way it is like citizen kane in story telling structure albeit here the flash backs are of 14 people (Dalai lamas). So, we will be reenacting mystical ancient stories which is major portion of the film besides the journalist's story. I am thinking to cast a decent TV actor to the play the journalist if not a star to attract financing. Do you think that is the right path? I am also exploring the support base of Tibetans including going to people like Richard Gere for support but they seem to be exhausted by all the fund raising going on in the community. So, investing in a movie seems to be furthest from their mind. Kundun got made because of Malisa (Harison Ford's wife) and Martin. I am writer/ director/producer all rolled in one right now with no name to attract studios or investors but I have full insight of the story and support from the Dalai Lama. My dilemma is not about utlilizing all the avenues possible to make this film since independent film making is about grabbing everything possible to make a project, my confusion is which is better and has more likely shot and thus should begin with first. (1) Go through traditional route with attachments, distribution, sales agent, etc. or (2) through crowd funding. Thank you for your input in advance. Pema