My novel is set in a small town in Idaho. As I have now adapted it, would I be wise to keep the city generic, as in "small town" in the slugline? Is making the location specific a good thing or a not so good thing when trying to pitch a script?
Thanks, Eric and Michael. Small mountain town with a lake and ski area is all I need. Lots of those around. But, yes, that's what I was thinking... didn't want to limit the possibilities. Thanks again!
"Don't Stop the Carnival" (1965) by Herman Wouk --- his novel takes place on "Amerigo" but anyone familiar with St. Thomas / US Virgin Is. will recognize the terrain. The book is still banned in the Caribbean. Avoid using real place names. My 2 cents.
Diana, give the town a fictitious name. Why waste a creative opportunity? A name sets a tone, gives a sense of realism and can add a little subtext... For example; in "What's Eating Gilbert Grape" the small town in Iowa was specifically named "Endora" because of how much the character "Gilbert" endures. Naming things is a nice way to hint at some hidden or not so hidden themes. :)
I second Ron and Beth. I see little upside to generic. Specific is always better. (I'd personally go with specific and fictitious, but specific either way.)
Good points to both schools of thought. I do like the feel of a specific place, gives it some grounding. I wanted to capture both that feeling with an eye for marketability as well, thus the generic aspect. Thank you everyone for your thoughts. Lots to think about.
As story is about characters and most are universal, I am trying generic. Originally have a scene set in Auckland NZ, where a battleship fires off rounds at local landmarks, this could be done in any harbour with hills, San Francisco, maybe. The story is about Kids showing a grown up, the right thing to do. I believe this allows the reader to connect with the story, relating to their past and environment. Would have posted a longer example but didn't want to be seen as highjacking the post to pitch.
1 person likes this
I have always kept it generic so that it would appeal to more buyers.
1 person likes this
Thanks, Eric and Michael. Small mountain town with a lake and ski area is all I need. Lots of those around. But, yes, that's what I was thinking... didn't want to limit the possibilities. Thanks again!
1 person likes this
"Don't Stop the Carnival" (1965) by Herman Wouk --- his novel takes place on "Amerigo" but anyone familiar with St. Thomas / US Virgin Is. will recognize the terrain. The book is still banned in the Caribbean. Avoid using real place names. My 2 cents.
Not necessary to the plot. Good points you've all made. Very much appreciated :)
2 people like this
Diana, give the town a fictitious name. Why waste a creative opportunity? A name sets a tone, gives a sense of realism and can add a little subtext... For example; in "What's Eating Gilbert Grape" the small town in Iowa was specifically named "Endora" because of how much the character "Gilbert" endures. Naming things is a nice way to hint at some hidden or not so hidden themes. :)
2 people like this
I second Ron and Beth. I see little upside to generic. Specific is always better. (I'd personally go with specific and fictitious, but specific either way.)
1 person likes this
Good points to both schools of thought. I do like the feel of a specific place, gives it some grounding. I wanted to capture both that feeling with an eye for marketability as well, thus the generic aspect. Thank you everyone for your thoughts. Lots to think about.
1 person likes this
As story is about characters and most are universal, I am trying generic. Originally have a scene set in Auckland NZ, where a battleship fires off rounds at local landmarks, this could be done in any harbour with hills, San Francisco, maybe. The story is about Kids showing a grown up, the right thing to do. I believe this allows the reader to connect with the story, relating to their past and environment. Would have posted a longer example but didn't want to be seen as highjacking the post to pitch.