Set in a modern American town, the story follows a Jewish protagonist who uncovers evidence that a respected local family has inherited and preserved extremist ideology with deep historical roots.
What begins as a personal betrayal escalates into a psychological war, forcing both sides to confront how far they’re willing to go to protect legacy, power, and identity.
The film is grounded, character-driven, and intentionally uncomfortable — focusing on manipulation and moral compromise.
I’m posting to gauge interest and discussion around the concept before moving into a full screenplay draft.
I’m especially interested in feedback on thematic clarity, audience reception, and market positioning for a story this morally confrontational.
Is this the kind of story audiences will lean into — or recoil from — and why?
Matt-E Wach
~MewtationstudiosNJ~
4 people like this
My thoughts - you asked about thematic clarity.
Para One
In a modern American town, a Jewish... -WHAT IS HE/SHE, THEY ARE MORE THAN JEWISH - ... discovers that a respected family inherited and still practice -- WHAT IS THE ANCIENT EXTREMIST IDEOLOGY.We know you are alluding to Nazi ideologies of totalitarianism, extreme nationalism, racism, and anti-Semitism, but its roots were hardly ancient, they were Prussian - or have you invented a new ancient ideology which is what the story is about? It would be the Third Reich which they inherited as the Fourth hasn't happened.
Para Two is fine - I like it a lot.
3 people like this
David Taylor really appreciate you taking the time to dig into this.
To clarify Para One: the protagonist (Aliza Warsowski) is Polish-Jewish and culturally modernized, not Hasidic. Her identity matters, but it isn’t her only defining trait — which is intentional. She’s a person first, whose heritage becomes unavoidable once the ideology she uncovers directly targets it. She’s also from a suburban town in New Jersey, Lyndhurst.
You’re right to flag the wording around “ancient.” I’m not suggesting Nazism itself is ancient, but that the human impulses it feeds on — cruelty, supremacy, inherited power — are as old as recorded history. The story treats the Third Reich as a modern manifestation of something far older, rather than a closed historical chapter.
The “Fourth Reich” language is meant to be provocative, not literal — a thematic inheritance rather than a historical claim. That tension is very much part of what the story is interrogating.
Glad Para Two landed — that’s reassuring. Thanks again for the thoughtful critique.
— Matt-E
2 people like this
Thanks. Although Nazism was constructed by Hitler, I do like the idea of a fictional device or culture which says it was more ancient than that. Anyhow - best of luck with the story.
2 people like this
Unique concept, Matthew Wach. I like that the story starts small and grows into something bigger. I can see audiences liking this movie. It's about things people deal with/have dealt with for years.