I'll repeat, this thing is far from over. Not even out of the 1st inning.
https://deadline.com/2026/02/paramount-sweetens-offer-warner-bros-discov...
I'll repeat, this thing is far from over. Not even out of the 1st inning.
https://deadline.com/2026/02/paramount-sweetens-offer-warner-bros-discov...
3 people like this
Thanks for sharing the article, Richard "RB" Botto. You're right. It's far from over. "It said the move comes to about $650 million in cash value each quarter." That's a lot each quarter!
2 people like this
So many cards yet to be played and hurdles to jump over., Maurice Vaughan
3 people like this
Thanks for sharing! Completely agree, each headline reads like a final chapter when we're still in the "previously on..." recap.
That said, I think it's important to be clear-eyed about where things actually stand. The WBD board just set a March 20 shareholder vote on the Netflix merger, and they continue to unanimously recommend it. Netflix has granted WBD a seven-day waiver (ending February 23) to hear Paramount's "best and final" offer, but the framing from WBD's side is telling: they're essentially saying "put up or shut up." And reportedly, over 93% of shareholders have so far rejected Paramount's tender offer.
Paramount is clearly not going quietly. They're offering to outright pay the $2.8 billion Netflix termination fee, Larry Ellison is personally guaranteeing $43.3 billion in financing, and they've signaled willingness to go to $31 a share or higher. That's not a company packing it in.
But wanting it badly and getting it done are two different things. WBD's board has called this the largest leveraged buyout in history, with serious questions around closing certainty and debt load. And the political and regulatory dimensions on both sides of the Atlantic add another layer of unpredictability for everyone involved.
So yeah, far from over. But the clock is ticking louder than the offers right now.
2 people like this
Fantastic summary of the recent news, Joshua Young. Appreciate your contribution to the thread.
And sure, this puts a clock on Paramount. But this line right here - And the political and regulatory dimensions on both sides of the Atlantic add another layer of unpredictability for everyone involved - is the only thing that matters. WBD may set their clock, but that doesn't mean it's THE clock.
Many twists and turns to come.
3 people like this
We're at a point where almost no one on the WBD board believes in the Paramount offer but there's also a genuine fear that the Netflix proposal will be blocked by the government. Members of the Justice Department have started to resign over the case and we've only just begun. Richard "RB" Botto is right, the clock is ticking but it's a regulatory one.
4 people like this
They're competing for a reason, the film and television industry is poised for exceptional growth and demand.
3 people like this
Either of the proposed mergers would be a disaster for the entertainment industry and for the audience. Netflix would be bad, but Paramount would be even worse. This is the EXACT thing that antitrust laws are supposed to prevent. We need diversification, not more consolidation.
2 people like this
There you are, Jack Binder, bringing reason to the party once again. Been happening internationally for years, before the strikes and heavier during the strikes and the momentum hasn't stopped. And if you think the recent spec buying and pendulum swinging on the TV side domestically isn't because some have finally heard the wake up call, you're not paying attention. And many aren't. They're just blinded and, sadly form their opinions, from headlines.