When transitioning a character from one scene to the next; do you use a V.O. Or go with a PRE-LAP? (I prefer the V.O. For dialog but use the PRE-LAP for SOUNDS.) When adding text over a scene; do you use SUPER or CHYRON? (I prefer SUPER for static text but CHYRON for streaming text.) What's your take?
Screenwriting : A question for those of you writing "spec" scripts by Doug Nelson
A question for those of you writing "spec" scripts
Other topics in Screenwriting:
Check out Trending Discussions
Register / Log In
1 person likes this
I would use (PRE-LAP) next to the character name if the dialogue was being heard before the next scene began, and it belonged in that next scene. Then I would follow with the next scene heading. I used CHYRON in TV production. I prefer the term CRAWL for moving text in screenplays.
I haven't had too many situations within my spec feature scripts in which those elements have been necessary. But I prefer to keep formatting very basic, minimal and straightforward, so I have used (V.O.) for dialogue being heard before or over a scene. For sound, I simply utilize description. For example, from my script Old Gods New Devils: "The voice of Mamá Dayo humming a melody carries over." Choosing between SUPER or CHYRON, I prefer SUPER—again, I just prefer basic, simple terminology. However, I've only had one scene in one feature script in which SUPER was needed. :)
1 person likes this
I agree with Beth on all fronts! I believe making it as easy for the reader to read as possible, and avoid complex terminology. The aesthetic of the word is so important in my opinion. SUPER is comparatively easier than CHYRON. The same with V.O. compared to PRE-LAP.
1 person likes this
I like to keep it simple also. However I have used SUPER (the date) to transition from the past to the present. (V.O) i've used to filter in voice before transitioning to the next scene. It worked well. Ms Heisinger I agree with the simplicity, it keeps the script simple. Always the A.B.C's, always the A.B.C's
1 person likes this
I asked the question because I'm seeing it (PRE-LAP & CHYRON) more frequently in the scripts I read. Personally, I still stick pretty much to ole' KISS philosophy. BILL, I more often think of CRAWL/ROLL as opening/closing credits – not so much as text within a scene. BETH, I would tighten that line to; PRE-LAP Mama Dayo HUMS. DAN, I suspect you work more on the industry side than the small-time Indie folk where the Directors need all the help they can get without feeling being talked down to.
Thanks for the suggestion, Doug. Much appreciated. I'll certainly consider it. But as currently written and within the context/tone of the scene and the story/script as a whole, it works well. ;) Have a wonderful 4th of July weekend, sir!