Yes. The catch is where you get the information about them - you will need to use information from multiple sources to make sure that nothing is the result of one biographer's exclusive information.
I did a script about an event that happened in my hometown during WW2, and one of the books had done an interview with a survivor. That interview was copyrighted information. I couldn't use it. But everything from multiple sources (not exclusive to a single source) could be used. Plus, I did my own research in historical archives and my own interviews with survivors - giving me exclusive material.
Sold to TBS, but the deal died when NBC announced their version of the event which had a name director attached.
We might have been neighbors! (actually my Aunt lived out there, I had a house in Dana Estates and then a house on Clayton Road (a mile or two from BART). )
especially if it about public events. The facts are public record. Not the telling of the facts. You cannot use the words from a newspaper. But the facts in the article can be used.
Michael L. Mizrahi I did but the comments had changed the topic so I was trying to clarify things. Thought it might be helpful. Considering your tone I won't do it again.
I'd go with Dan G on this one - think you're alright but if your figure was/is a famous figure; you might want to research any descendants who may/may not care.
3 people like this
Yes. The catch is where you get the information about them - you will need to use information from multiple sources to make sure that nothing is the result of one biographer's exclusive information.
I did a script about an event that happened in my hometown during WW2, and one of the books had done an interview with a survivor. That interview was copyrighted information. I couldn't use it. But everything from multiple sources (not exclusive to a single source) could be used. Plus, I did my own research in historical archives and my own interviews with survivors - giving me exclusive material.
Sold to TBS, but the deal died when NBC announced their version of the event which had a name director attached.
1 person likes this
WM, I'm pretty sure I know the event you're referring to. I used to live on a street that backed up onto Port Chicago Highway.
1 person likes this
We might have been neighbors! (actually my Aunt lived out there, I had a house in Dana Estates and then a house on Clayton Road (a mile or two from BART). )
1 person likes this
especially if it about public events. The facts are public record. Not the telling of the facts. You cannot use the words from a newspaper. But the facts in the article can be used.
1 person likes this
Yes
1 person likes this
Don't know for persons but I believe after 70 years or so, all published work automatically falls into public domain.
1 person likes this
I agree with Kiril, I think after 70 years you are good...
Just out of curiosity your talking about a person, not their published works, right? The 70 years wouldn't necessarily apply the same way.
Bill Albert Please read the question
Michael L. Mizrahi I did but the comments had changed the topic so I was trying to clarify things. Thought it might be helpful. Considering your tone I won't do it again.
1 person likes this
I'd go with Dan G on this one - think you're alright but if your figure was/is a famous figure; you might want to research any descendants who may/may not care.