When Battlestar Galactica debuted its reboot in 2003, it came with one of the boldest creative decisions in science fiction television: reimagining the iconic fighter pilot Starbuck, originally played by Dirk Benedict in the 1978 series, as a woman, portrayed by Katee Sackhoff.
In a recent interview, Sackhoff shared that she was booed at Comic-Con during the show’s launch for taking on the role, describing how difficult it was to face backlash simply for stepping into a gender-swapped character. You can read the full article here: https://deadline.com/2025/10/katee-sackhoff-comic-con-fans-booed-battles...
Sackhoff said the criticism “upset me a little bit” at the time, but she stayed focused on the work and over time, fans came around. By the end of the series, her performance as Kara “Starbuck” Thrace wasn’t just accepted; it was celebrated as one of the most complex, human, and iconic portrayals in modern sci-fi television.
Personally, I think Sackhoff’s Starbuck is one of the best performances I’ve ever seen, fierce, flawed, unpredictable, and deeply real. It’s a perfect example of how reinterpretation in casting can breathe new life into a familiar story and expand representation on screen.
So let’s open the discussion:
What are your thoughts on gender or identity changes in established IP characters?
Do you feel it gives actors more creative opportunity, or can it alienate fans when handled poorly?
And are there any performances, like Sackhoff’s, that completely changed your mind about a reimagined role?
5 people like this
I'm ok with gender-swapping in established IP if there's a reason in the story for it or it's a creative decision by a producer, director, writer, etc., Ashley Renee Smith. I think it gives actors more creative opportunity, and it can alienate fans when handled poorly.
6 people like this
Ok... gonna make some enemies on this one. Buuuuuut, here we go.
Generally, I'm against it. Because what usually happens is that when they switch it out, usually for a "girl boss" type character, she has no flaws and thus her "arc" is boring. Nothing is learned, the character is the same as they were in the beginning. I hate that in any case but especially when there's a swap of some sort from the original IP.
However, as a super fan of Battlestar Galactica, I LOVED her as Starbuck! The reason is exactly what you pointed it out in your post. She was flawed. As a fighter pilot, she was often undisciplined and bucked authority. She wasn't perfect...which is what made her perfect.
5 people like this
That’s such a great point, Maurice Vaughan, it really does come down to intention and execution. When there’s a clear creative or thematic reason behind a gender swap, it can open the door to new perspectives and performances that breathe fresh life into an existing story. But if it feels like a marketing move rather than a storytelling one, audiences can sense that disconnect immediately.
It’s such a fine balance between honoring legacy and pushing creative boundaries, and when it works, like Katee Sackhoff’s Battlestar Galactica Starbuck, it can redefine what’s possible for a character.
5 people like this
I actually really appreciate that take, Brandon Keeton, and I think a lot of people quietly agree with you. When gender-swapping is done without depth or vulnerability, it can feel more like a statement than storytelling. What made Katee Sackhoff’s Starbuck so unforgettable was exactly what you described. That’s the difference between representation that feels real and representation that feels manufactured. When writers allow characters, regardless of gender, to be messy, complicated, and imperfect, that’s when audiences connect on a genuine level.
3 people like this
First of all, BATTLESTAR GALATICA is one of my favorite shows. Yes, I am old enough to have watched the original and I thought it was awesome that Starbuck was going to be female. It's a sign of the times. Plus it takes place in the future, so to not treat women as just as capable wouldn't fit That goes with Brandon's point, the gender swap serves a purpose. I would also like to point out that Boomer was also reimagined as an Asian woman, for some reason no one seems as upset about.
It does give actors more creative opportunity. Ronald D Moore as he did Star Trek not surprised he made those changes to BG. Some characters are written for a man, but are really genderless and oftentimes, casting does cast a woman for a part that was written for a man.
But, the question is about established IP. I don't know how many people are aware of this, but Neil Simon wrote a female version of THE ODD COUPLE. You didn't know that? That's my point. It's not as funny. Which brings to mind, Ashley Renee Smith how do you feel about the all female OCEAN"S ELEVEN?
2 people like this
I'm going to have to watch it. I loved the original and skipped the remake, because it's a remake. I love Katee Sackkhoff's work. Just now I had to look at her IMDb to see where the Battlestar Gallactica gig came into play. I'm good with the gender switch. I get why the comic-com faithful were upset. Every little change up can trigger them. And they worry about characters and franchises straying from their intension. I'm glad they eventually saw the light. Anyway, thank you for the link. And I highly recommend Katee's podcast.